Lawrence Kolodney on Contingent Fee Litigation

Authors

Name

Lawrence K. Kolodney

Person title

Principal

By: Lawrence Kolodney

Fish attorney Lawrence Kolodney recently published an article in Corporate Counsel, where he dives into contingent fee litigation and why in-house counsel should consider it given its rising popularity in patent litigation.

To read the full article, click here.

The opinions expressed are those of the authors on the date noted above and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fish & Richardson P.C., any other of its lawyers, its clients, or any of its or their respective affiliates. This post is for general information purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed.

Corporate Counsel: Contingent Fee Litigation—A Low Risk Way to Enforce and Monetize Your Patents

Authors

The Return of Opinions of Counsel in Patent Cases: How Recent Judicial Decisions Have Made Them Relevant Once More

Patent Litigation for the Non-Specialist: How it Works and What to Expect

PTAB Decision Highlights Little Used Claim Amendment Process in America Invents Act Patent Challenges

Cybersecurity Litigation Strategies: Jurisdiction

Introduction to SEP & FRAND Issues

Is Reverse Engineering Misappropriation of Trade Secrets?

How a Second Trump Presidency Could Shape IP

Texas Patent Litigation Monthly Wrap-Up: October 2024

Trade Secrets: A Powerful Alternative to Noncompete Agreements

Should the Experimental Use Exception Be Broadened?

Taking a Good Deposition, Part II: Asking the Right Kind of Questions and Asking Them in the Right Way

The Final Word on an Alleged Infringer’s Intent in a Hatch-Waxman Safe Harbor Analysis

Preparing Your Company for Hatch-Waxman