Blog
Federal Circuit overturns $1.67 billion patent verdict against Abbott Labs
Authors
-
- Name
- Person title
- Principal
The Federal Circuit wiped out the largest patent verdict in U.S. history in a case involving Abbott Lab's Humira arthritis drug. (To see the case, click here.) A jury in the Eastern District of Texas had found Abbott infringed a patent held by Centocor Ortho Biotech, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson. The Federal Circuit found the patent invalid for failure to satisfy the written description requirement, thereby eliminating the $1.67B verdict which consisted of $1.17B in lost profits and a $504M reasonable royalty. Another $176M in interest was later tacked on.
The huge verdict had supplanted a $1.52B verdict against Microsoft in the Lucent litigation. Unlike the Abbott Labs case, the Microsoft verdict was overturned by the district judge (Judge Rudy Brewster of the Southern District of California) on post-trial motions. The Federal Circuit affirmed Judge Brewster's rulings. Here, in contrast, the verdict was still intact when it reached the Federal Circuit, and the Federal Circuit found that trial judge erred in failing to find the patent invalid.
The opinions expressed are those of the authors on the date noted above and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fish & Richardson P.C., any other of its lawyers, its clients, or any of its or their respective affiliates. This post is for general information purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed.