Blog
Recent Articles on Patent Damages
Authors
-
- Name
- Person title
- Principal
If the following list of articles is any indication, patent damages is a hot topic in the scholarly journals. Only a few years ago there were very few articles written on patent damages.
NOTE: ALL YOUR BASE BELONGS TO US: TOWARDS AN APPROPRIATE USAGE AND DEFINITION OF THE "ENTIRE MARKET VALUE" RULE IN REASONABLE ROYALTIES CALCULATIONS, 53 B.C. L. Rev. 233 (2012)
ARTICLE: Reconsidering the Georgia-Pacific Standard for Reasonable Royalty Patent Damages, 2010 BYU L. Rev. 1661 (2010)
ARTICLE: MAKING SENSE OF "APPORTIONMENT" IN PATENT DAMAGES n1, 12 Colum. Sci. & Tech. L. Rev. 255 (2011)
SYMPOSIUM REVIEW: PATENT VALUE APPORTIONMENT RULES FOR COMPLEX, MULTI-PATENT PRODUCTS, 27 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 763 (2010)
SYMPOSIUM REVIEW: FOUR PRINCIPLES FOR CALCULATING REASONABLE ROYALTIES IN PATENT INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION, 27 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 725 (2010)
ARTICLE: ANALYSIS OF THE ENTIRE MARKET VALUE RULE IN COMPLEX TECHNOLOGY LITIGATION: ARDUOUS ROYALTY BASE DETERMINATIONS, UNJUST DAMAGE REWARDS, AND EMPIRICAL APPROACHES TO MEASURING CONSUMER DEMAND, 27 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 639 (2011)
ARTICLE: CONTRACTING PATENTS: A MODERN PATENT EXHAUSTION DOCTRINE, 23 Harv. J. Law and Tec 483 (2010)
ARTICLE: "REFORM" ARRIVES IN PATENT ENFORCEMENT: THE BIG PICTURE, 51 IDEA 357 (2011) REVIEWS AND CASES OF NOTE: Pitfalls in Determining the Reasonable Royalty in Patent Cases, 17 J. Legal Econ. 75 (2010)
ARTICLE: PROTECTING THE GATES OF REASONABLE ROYALTY: A DAMAGES FRAMEWORK FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT CASES, 11 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 192 (2011)
ARTICLE: The Real Problem with Patent Infringement Damages, 91 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y 484 (2009)
The opinions expressed are those of the authors on the date noted above and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fish & Richardson P.C., any other of its lawyers, its clients, or any of its or their respective affiliates. This post is for general information purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed.