Thought Leadership | Fish & Richardson

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

Pro Bono & Social Responsibility

Legal Operations

Legal Project Management

Knowledge Management

Legal Technology Services

Patent Litigation

Trademark, Copyright & Media Litigation

Trade Secret Litigation

Chancery & Corporate Governance

<p><em>Inter Partes </em>Review</p>

Post-Grant Review

<p><em>Ex Parte</em> Reexamination</p>

Supplemental Examination

Patent Prosecution

Strategic Patent Counseling & Opinions

Patent Portfolio Management

Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court

IP Licensing, Transactions & Agreements

Trademark & Copyright Counseling & Prosecution

Strategic Counseling, Registration & Opinions

Advertising & Marketing

Domain Names & Internet

TTAB Oppositions & Cancellations

Digital Millennium Copyright Act

Transactions & Agreements

Regulatory & Government Affairs

Communications & Spectrum Regulation

Drug & Medical Device Regulation

mHealth & Telemedicine

Privacy & Data Security

Electrical & Computer Technology

Software & Internet

Consumer Electronics

Artificial Intelligence

Digital Media & E-Commerce

Financial, Business & FinTech Services

Telecommunications

Energy & Chemicals

Biotech & Diagnostics

Medical Devices

Pharmaceuticals

Academic Research & Medical Centers

Transportation, Aerospace & Defense

Autonomous Vehicles

Thought Leadership

IP Law Essentials

Post-Grant Annual Reports

Blog | December 11, 2014

Would 3D Printing Be A Disruptive Technology Today Without A Strong Patent System?

Blog | December 10, 2014

District of Nebraska excludes cost-savings apportionment model

Blog | December 10, 2014

ITC — Recent Commission Opinion Emphasizes Need To Show A "Nexus" Between Patent Claims and An R&D Based Domestic Industry

Blog | December 10, 2014

Parties May Introduce New Evidence in Section 146 Proceedings Not Presented To the PTO During an Interference, Even on Issues Not Raised at the PTO

Blog | December 10, 2014

Summary Judgment of Noninfringement Appropriate Where No One Configuration of the Accused Product Literally Met All Limitations and Prosecution History Estoppel Precluded Reliance on Equivalents

Blog | December 10, 2014

Claims to Guaranteeing a Party's Performance of an Online Transaction Were Invalid Under Section 101

Blog | December 10, 2014

Narrow Constructions Unwarranted Where Specification Did Not Exclude a Broader Reading; Equivalents Analysis Should Not Be "Shortcut" With Binary Choice

Blog | December 09, 2014

Reissue Unavailable Where Applicants Failed to Identify an "Error" That Led Them to File a Terminal Disclaimer They Later Sought to Alter

Blog | December 08, 2014

Supreme Court Will Review the Standard for Induced Infringement

Blog | December 06, 2014

FDA Citizen Petition May Give Rise to Antitrust Liability; Factual Issues Exist Concerning Whether ANDA Infringement Claim Was Objectively Baseless

Blog | December 05, 2014

No En Banc Consideration of Questions Related to "Unexpected Results" and the Definition of "Reasonable Expectation of Success"

Blog | December 05, 2014

Court Could Not Correct a Claim Where PTO's Error Was Not Evident from the Patent; Patentee Could Not Assert Uncorrected Claim