Thought Leadership | Fish & Richardson

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

Pro Bono & Social Responsibility

Legal Operations

Legal Project Management

Knowledge Management

Legal Technology Services

Patent Litigation

Trademark, Copyright & Media Litigation

Trade Secret Litigation

Chancery & Corporate Governance

<p><em>Inter Partes </em>Review</p>

Post-Grant Review

<p><em>Ex Parte</em> Reexamination</p>

Supplemental Examination

Patent Prosecution

Strategic Patent Counseling & Opinions

Patent Portfolio Management

Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court

IP Licensing, Transactions & Agreements

Trademark & Copyright Counseling & Prosecution

Strategic Counseling, Registration & Opinions

Advertising & Marketing

Domain Names & Internet

TTAB Oppositions & Cancellations

Digital Millennium Copyright Act

Transactions & Agreements

Regulatory & Government Affairs

Communications & Spectrum Regulation

Drug & Medical Device Regulation

mHealth & Telemedicine

Privacy & Data Security

Electrical & Computer Technology

Software & Internet

Consumer Electronics

Artificial Intelligence

Digital Media & E-Commerce

Financial, Business & FinTech Services

Telecommunications

Energy & Chemicals

Biotech & Diagnostics

Medical Devices

Pharmaceuticals

Academic Research & Medical Centers

Transportation, Aerospace & Defense

Autonomous Vehicles

Thought Leadership

IP Law Essentials

Post-Grant Annual Reports

Blog | February 26, 2014

Lexicography may not override ordinary meaning in the absence of clear disclaimer

Blog | February 21, 2014

Claim check

Blog | February 21, 2014

No foreseeability exception to doctrine of equivalents

Blog | February 21, 2014

180-Day Statute of Limitations Under 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(3) & (4) Applies to Final PTA Determinations, Although Time Between Allowance and Issuance Should Not Be Excluded

Blog | February 21, 2014

No foreseeability exception to doctrine of equivalents

Blog | February 20, 2014

Objective indicia of nonobviousness Whose burden is it?

Blog | February 20, 2014

Inurement for 102(g)(2) Does Not Require the Inventor to Expressly Direct Another to Reduce His Invention to Practice

Blog | February 20, 2014

NDCA denies summary judgment based in part on statutory presumption of damages

Blog | February 19, 2014

Third-Party requester does not need to file cross-appeal to advance alternative basis of invalidity where there is no decision favorable to patentability

Article | February 19, 2014

Settlement Doesn't Guarantee End Of Post-Grant Proceeding

Article | February 14, 2014

In Vivo Conversion As Inducement To Infringe

Blog | February 12, 2014

Oregon and Kentucky crack down on "patent trolls"