Recent Developments Impacting Hatch-Waxman Litigation

To access a recording of this webinar or receive a copy of the slides, please contact [email protected].

The past year saw significant decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and various district courts that impact Hatch-Waxman practice. As one example, the Supreme Court’s decision in Daimler AG v. Bauman has complicated the issue of personal jurisdiction in Hatch-Waxman lawsuits. Moreover, in Commil v. Cisco, the Supreme Court is considering whether a good faith belief in patent invalidity negates inducement under section 271(b).

Join Jon Singer and Brian Coggio, principals at Fish & Richardson, as they discuss noteworthy decisions from 2014. You can also expect this webinar to address:

• Personal jurisdiction in Hatch-Waxman litigation
• Good faith belief in invalidity to negate inducement
• Obviousness in view of Bristol’s Baraclude decision
• Drug labels as inducing infringement
• Sham litigation and the recent Tyco decision
• IPRs and their potential impact on Hatch-Waxman litigation