“Recent and Pending Supreme Court Decisions in Intellectual Property,” Suffolk Law School (October 2006)
“The Unappealing Prospect of a Federal Circuit Cross-Appeal,” Technology Law Alert (March 2001)
“Intellectual Property Law Catches Up With the Internet,” Technology Law Alert (February 2001)
“The Coming Scourge [sic, Surge] of Internet Patents,” com Magazine (April 2000)
“Coerced Waiver of the Attorney-Client Privilege for Opinions of Counsel in Patent Litigation,” 80 Minn. L. Rev. 167 (1995)
“Patents: A Historical Perspective,” manuscript of casebook co-authored with Frank P. Porcelli, the John A. Reilly Visiting Professor of Patent Law at Harvard Law School
Speaking engagements
“Districts and Decisions: Does Location Really Matter,” IP Law Review (October 2008) (presentation given in New York City on venue selection for patent cases)
“Hot Topics in Supreme Court and Federal Circuit Law: Implications for IP Strategy & Licensing,” IP Symposium (April 2008)
“Remedies After eBay,” Presentation given in Seoul, Republic of Korea (December 2006)
“Infringement Licensing from a Licensee Perspective,” Hot Topics in IP Licensing 2006(Minnesota CLE) (June 2006)
“Substantive Issues for Pre-Suit Investigations,” Minnesota CLE (February 2006)
“Are Patent Attorneys Environmentalists? Post-Sale Restrictions on Use and Re-Use of Medical Devices,” Patent Protection for Medical Devices (Minnesota CLE) (May 2004)
“Update on Attorney Opinion Issues in Patent Litigation,” Chapter Fourteen, The IP Book(Midwest Intellectual Property Institute 2003)
“Claim Drafting in Contemplation of Implied License and Exhaustion Issues,” AIPLA Spring Meeting (May 2003)
Media mentions
“Rejected post-Arthrex bids signal uncertainty over USPTO authority,” World IP Review(August 2021)
“Patent Cases To Watch In The 2nd Half Of 2018,” Law360 (July 2018)
“Venue ‘Loophole’ For Foreign Cos. Open, But Limited,” Law360 (May 2018)
“Decline in patent suits raises questions for attorneys, law firms,” San Francisco Daily Journal (November 2016)
“Saying ‘Do It On A Computer’ Not Enough For A Patent, Supreme Court Rules,” Forbes (June 2014)
“Minnesota Draws Accolades for Settlement With ‘Troll’, The National Law Journal(August 2013)
Interviewed for Law360 Q&A (April 2013)
“Business Owners Adjusting to Patent System Overhaul,” The New York Times and recapped in Minneapolis/St. Paul Business Journal, “How patent law changes are impacting startups“
“Are Business Methods Worthy of Being Patented?” San Francisco Daily Journal (May 2008)
“Federal Circuit Ruling Impacts Patent Owners,” National Law Review (April 2007)
“Patently Good Publicity,” IP Law & Business (May 2006)
“Lawyers Turn to Old Websites for Evidence,” Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly (August 2005)
“Panel Tosses the Dictionary in Patent Cases,” San Francisco Daily Journal (July 2005)